reported were extracted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reported were extracted for" is not correct in English as it lacks clarity and proper structure.
It could be used in a context where you are discussing data or information that has been reported and subsequently extracted for a specific purpose, but it needs rephrasing for clarity. Example: "The results that were reported were extracted for further analysis."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Data on background characteristics (participants, study purpose, sample size, design, scales reported) were extracted for each study.

BMC Geriatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Data on sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and outcome reporting were extracted for each retention trial to assess risk of bias.

BMJ Open

Where reported, ORs were extracted for low versus high socioeconomic status.

BMJ Open

If studies did not report this, data were extracted for men and women combined.

BMC Public Health

In 3 studies also subjects with at least one local [ 16– 18] or systemic [ 15– 17] reaction were reported and these values were extracted for the meta-analysis, in others the most frequent local [ 15] or systemic [ 18] reaction was extracted.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Data were extracted for all reported time points.

BMJ Open

Data on mean adherence outcomes were extracted for each reported adherence variable, with a 95%% confidence interval (CI) or standard deviation (SD) for all the study groups.

Drugs

15 Data on SF-36 outcomes were extracted for the reported analyses that corresponded as closely as possible to the same time points as for primary outcome data.

British Medical Journal

Using the Animal Bite Keyword Report, statewide ED visit data were extracted for 2008 2010.

Emerging Health Threats Journal

Using the Animal Bite ICD-9-CM Code Report, statewide ED visit data were extracted for 2008 2010.

Emerging Health Threats Journal

In studies reporting more than one outcome measure, data were extracted for the primary outcome.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To improve clarity, restructure the sentence. For instance, use "Data were extracted as reported" or "The reported data were extracted".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "reported were extracted for" due to its non-standard structure. Rephrasing will enhance clarity and ensure grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase's intended grammatical function is to describe an action where previously "reported" information is subsequently "extracted". However, the word order and structure make it grammatically unsound, as noted by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reported were extracted for" is grammatically incorrect and awkwardly structured. While it appears in some scientific contexts, as shown by Ludwig's examples, it's not a standard or clear way to express the idea of retrieving reported data. Ludwig AI suggests that rephrasing is necessary to improve clarity and grammatical correctness. Consider using alternatives such as "Data were extracted as reported" or "The reported data were extracted" for better communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

data were extracted as reported

The structure is inverted to place "extracted" before "reported", improving flow.

extracted data as reported

This version uses "extracted data" as a noun phrase.

data extracted were reported

This variant puts the emphasis on the data that was extracted.

data were extracted for reporting

This highlights the reporting purpose of the extraction.

reported data were extracted

This emphasizes the data was already reported when extracted.

data that were reported were extracted

This version provides more clarity by using a relative clause.

the reported data were extracted

Using "the" adds a sense of specificity to the data.

data were extracted from the report

Focuses on the report as the source of extraction.

values reported were extracted

Replaces "data" with "values" for a more specific context.

findings reported were extracted

Substitutes "data" with "findings" to focus on research results.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "reported were extracted for" to be grammatically correct?

You can use phrases like "Data were extracted as "reported"" or "The "reported data" were extracted" for better clarity.

What does "reported were extracted for" mean?

The phrase attempts to describe a process where data that has been reported is then extracted for a specific purpose or analysis. However, the phrasing is awkward and can be improved for better understanding.

Is "reported were extracted for" commonly used in academic writing?

No, "reported were extracted for" is not commonly used. Standard phrasing such as "Data were extracted as reported" is preferred in academic and formal writing.

What are some alternatives to "data were extracted as reported"?

Alternatives include "The "reported data" were retrieved", "Data were "obtained" from the report", or "Information was "gathered" from what was "reported"" depending on the context.