reported to

USAGE SUMMARY

"reported to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when someone is relaying information they were told by another person. For example, "The customer reported to the customer service representative that they were unsatisfied with the product they received."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mrs Merkel is reported to be wavering.

The Economist

They both reported to Mr. Florio.

The New York Times

"The former general manager reported to me.

The New York Times - Sports

Allegations must be reported to the police.

Independent

Hapgood reported to Washington for duty.

The New York Times

Incidents reported to local authorities dropped.

The New York Times

MetroPCS is reported to be — surprise!

The New York Times

The price was reported to be $10.

The New York Times

He was reported to be 69.

The New York Times

The Royal Family is reported to disapprove.

The New Yorker

Reported to the authorities by Phil Pelling.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating a hierarchical relationship, use "reported to" to clearly establish the chain of command or supervision within an organization or system.

Common error

Avoid using "reported for" when you mean "reported to". "Reported to" indicates a superior or destination for information, while "reported for" suggests a reason or purpose for reporting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reported to" functions primarily as a verb phrase, indicating the act of conveying information or being under the authority or supervision of someone. It is commonly used to show a transfer of information or a hierarchical relationship, as seen in Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

77%

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reported to" is a versatile verb phrase used to indicate the act of conveying information or being under someone's supervision. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its grammatical structure is correct and is considered usable in written English. As shown by the numerous examples available in Ludwig, this phrase is very common. The usage patterns reveal that it is frequently found in news and media, as well as in wikis, but less common in formal business contexts. To enhance clarity and precision in your writing, remember to differentiate "reported to" from "reported for", as the latter indicates the reason or purpose of reporting. When selecting alternatives, consider nuances in formality and intent, such as "informed", "notified", or "communicated to".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

communicated to

Highlights the act of transmission of information rather than the specific act of reporting.

informed

Focuses on the act of conveying information, omitting the directionality implied by "reported to".

apprised of

Suggests the act of informing someone of something specific or important, lending an air of importance not always present in "reported to".

notified

Emphasizes the formal aspect of informing someone, differing from the potentially informal nature of "reported to".

was said to

Implies hearsay or indirect reporting, whereas "reported to" can be more direct.

gave an account to

Focuses on providing a detailed explanation, suggesting more depth than simply "reported to".

accounted to

Indicates a formal explanation or justification given to someone, adding a layer of accountability absent in "reported to".

answerable to

Highlights the responsibility aspect of a reporting relationship, absent in a neutral relay of information.

under the command of

Emphasizes a direct subordinate relationship, which may be more specific than the broader sense of hierarchy implied by "reported to".

advised

Focuses on giving counsel or recommendations, whereas "reported to" primarily concerns relaying information or hierarchical positions.

FAQs

How can I use "reported to" in a sentence?

"Reported to" can be used to indicate that someone is conveying information to someone else, or that someone is under the supervision of another person. For example, "The incident was "reported to the police"" or "She "reported to the manager"".

What are some alternatives to "reported to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "informed", "notified", or "communicated to". These options can offer a nuanced way of expressing the act of relaying information.

Is it correct to say "reported at" instead of "reported to"?

No, "reported at" is not typically used in the same context as "reported to". "Reported at" generally refers to a location where something was reported, while "reported to" indicates the recipient of the report or a supervisory relationship.

What's the difference between "reported to" and "was said to"?

"Reported to" usually implies a direct relay of information, potentially from a reliable source. "Was said to", on the other hand, suggests hearsay or an unverified statement. For example, "He "reported to the authorities"" is more concrete than "He "was said to have left"".