Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The reported reliability is the Reliability of the Rater Separation.
Similar(59)
The smaller the sampling error of a study and thus the larger its sample size (manuscripts) is, the more the reported reliability coefficient is a true estimate of the reliability of the study.
The statistically significant regression coefficient of −.03 in model 1 can be interpreted as follows: The more manuscripts (divided by 100) that a study is based on, the smaller the reported reliability coefficients are.
We therefore assume a distinctly more marked publication bias for studies on IRR: With a small sample, the results are published only if the reported reliability coefficients are high.
If the reported reliability coefficients are low, on the other hand, a study has to be based on a large number of manuscripts to justify publication.
We found overall reported reliability to be between 81% and 87% for the systems studied (table 2).
However, it has been reported that reliability is only fair when the GAF is scored by clinicians rather than researchers [ 27].
Additionally, we examine how the study-to-study variation of the reported reliability coefficients can be explained by covariates.
The reported reliability for this scale is 0.85.
Agreement is reported as limits of agreement (LoA) and reliability is reported with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Reliability is reported with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1) including 95% confidence intervals and is reported within raters of the same profession.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com