Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Despite a reported recognition accuracy rate of 98%, speech recognition technologies have yet to be widely adopted by computer users.
Similar(59)
In terms of context-dependent recognition, the results document that presenting familiar contexts at test leads to higher confidence and lower rates of 'don't know' responses compared to novel contexts, while having no effect on forced-report recognition accuracy.
In terms of context-dependent discrimination, the results show that reinstated contexts further boost confidence and reduce 'don't know' responding compared to familiar contexts, while affecting forced-report recognition accuracy only when contribution of recollection to recognition performance is high.
1) For the behavioural results, the authors report that the slopes of learning were no different for permanent versus transient landmarks and neither were the final measures of recognition, but do not report whether recognition accuracy differed across the permanent and transient landmarks at time points throughout learning (i.e. when analyzed by quarter, in keeping with the imaging results).
Soyel and Hassan classified the seven fundamental expressions[10] using six distance measures and reported a mean recognition accuracy of 91.3%.
Tie Yun and Ling Guan[15] using the same database extracted 3D Gabor features and reported an average recognition accuracy of 85.39%.
We report the mean recognition accuracy over 20 random splits.
We also report the mean recognition accuracy over 20 random splits.
Surprisingly, Machado de Sousa and Hallak [ 43] reported no differences in recognition accuracy or emotional intensity scores within the Facial Emotion Recognition Task between patients on clozapine compared with healthy controls.
In this section, all experimental results report the top 1 recognition accuracy.
The average recognition accuracy was reported as 81.3%, which represents comparable performance with that of the bimodal indicators.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com