reported of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reported of" is not correct in written English.
Instead, you would use the phrase "reportedly" or "reported." For example: The event was reportedly very successful.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

No reaction was reported of the mother.

The New York Times

Would that the same could be reported of Ansel Elgort.

The New Yorker

He died, the Post reported, "of natural causes".

The New Yorker

Goldman apparently took exception to Comerford's description, which I reported, of subprime mortgage securities as "crap".

The Guardian - Business

Amnesty has had cases reported of women detained at immigration centres and removed within 48 hours.

The Guardian - Opinion

Pardew reported of Halsey: "He said, 'If I have missed it, I apologise'.

The Guardian - Sport

At least a hundred incidents were reported of students in banlieue schools refusing to observe it.

The New Yorker

2.09pm BST There are no changes at the top to be reported of just yet.

The Guardian - Sport

It's another example, as Time magazine recently reported, of the way that Twitter could change the way we live.

The Guardian

Significantly, he reported of the left-handed man, "the past has left its mark with the writer".

The Guardian

"It's just a massive catastrophe," Eosphoros reported of the microaggressions he encountered even in his work-study life.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "reported of". Instead, use "reported by" or rephrase the sentence to use "reported that" for grammatical accuracy.

Common error

The incorrect use of "of" after "reported" can create confusion. Remember that "report" typically takes "by" to indicate the source, or is followed by "that" to introduce the reported information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reported of" functions as a prepositional phrase, but it's grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, it should be replaced by alternatives like "reported by" or "reportedly". The correct usage clarifies the source or manner of reporting.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reported of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in modern English. Ludwig AI suggests using alternatives such as "reported by" or rephrasing the sentence to use "reported that" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy. While examples exist, predominantly in News & Media and Science contexts, it's best to avoid this phrase to maintain credibility and professionalism in writing. Remember, correct preposition usage is key to clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Reported by

Uses the correct preposition to indicate the source of the report.

According to reports

Emphasizes that the information comes from multiple reports.

It was reported that

Rephrases the sentence to correctly use "reported" as a verb.

Sources indicate

Offers a less formal way to express that information has been received.

The article stated

Specifies the type of report as an article.

As mentioned in the report

Highlights a specific report as the source.

News outlets confirm

Highlights the confirmation of news from media sources.

Documented in the study

Emphasizes the presence of information in a research study.

Detailed in the findings

The information is found in the specific data set.

It has come to light

Expresses discovery, often implying surprise or new information.

FAQs

How can I properly use "reported" in a sentence?

You can use "reported by" to indicate the source of the information, or "reported that" to introduce the information itself. For example, "The incident was "reported by" eyewitnesses" or "It was "reported that" the negotiations were successful".

What is a grammatically correct alternative to "reported of"?

Instead of "reported of", use phrases like "reported by", "according to reports", or "it was reported that" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Is there a difference in meaning between "reported of" and "reported by"?

Yes, "reported of" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "reported by", which indicates the source or agent providing the report. Using "reported of" introduces grammatical errors and potential misunderstanding.

Can "reported of" ever be considered acceptable in formal writing?

No, "reported of" is not considered acceptable in formal writing. It's crucial to use grammatically correct alternatives like "reported by" or "according to reports" to maintain credibility and clarity in your writing.