Sentence examples for reported improperly from inspiring English sources

Congress has been concerned about the issue since last May, when the Navy and the Air Force reported improperly financing repairs on several large homes.

In addition to lacking a business or line of work, the names of some donors to Mr. Thompson's campaign appear to have been reported improperly, making them easy to overlook.

Researchers at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center here failed to report the death of a patient in gene therapy experiments and might have contributed to the growth of cancer in another patient, whose condition was also reported improperly, investigators for the Food and Drug Administration have said.

Screen Time is a work in progress and has a myriad of bugs from issues with family members being unable to leave the monitored group to statistics being reported improperly.

Each rider starts off with a score of 100, and earns points for taking rides or reporting improperly parked bikes.

This prompted Mobike to implement a system that lets its users report improperly parked bikes that belong to it in China and in Manchester it is taking a cautious approach to its rollout by starting with a six-month trial period.

"We stand ready to not only continue serving our clients with the dignity and respect that they deserve, but respond to our neighbors' concerns about needle litter by providing more consistent sharps disposal, community needle sweeps and a hotline to report improperly discharged syringes," Augustine added.

The Flag transaction, however, may indicate that the company reported profits improperly, or at least in a way that bore no resemblance to economic reality, and that the executives collected bonuses based on those so-called profits.

Innocent Spouse Relief provides you relief from additional tax you owe if your spouse or former spouse failed to report income, reported income improperly or claimed improper deductions or credits.

In holding that the Nixon administration could not prevent The New York Times or The Washington Post from publishing articles detailing the findings of a classified report improperly leaked by a third party, the Court established the principle that the government may not simply use a vague invocation of national security to censor an individual prior to publication.

Not long ago it emerged that the US government had spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a programme intended to detect national security threats that, according to an Associated Press  report, "improperly collected information about innocent Americans and produced little valuable intelligence on terrorism".