Sentence examples for reported dislocations from inspiring English sources

Leunig et al. (1998) reported dislocations of the hip in 5 of 12 patients after implantation of a hand-made spacer.

Sikorski [24] reported dislocation rates of 10% in the Thompson prostheses.

The reported dislocation rate was 0.4%.

The 1-year risk in the study by Howie et al. (2012) is high compared to others; Stroh et al. (2013) reported dislocation with head sizes less than 36 mm of only 1.8% (10 in 559) at 5 years, which is similar to the English NHS data (taking into account that most dislocations occur in the first year after surgery) (Jameson et al. 2011).

Most studies report dislocation as the most common complication after THA, regardless of whether or not the procedure involves cementing [ 4, 13].

Both Paavilainen et al. (1993) and Carlsson et al. (2003) reported late dislocations in their series, and a plausible reason for the relatively high dislocation rate was the use of small 22-mm heads.

[9] reported five dislocations in 40 revision hip arthroplasties using the Wagner stem and suggested two main reasons for these dislocations: lack of active soft tissue tension related to abductor muscle atrophy, and low offset of the prosthesis, which results in impingement of the trochanteric region into the pelvis.

They also reported no dislocations in their study.

Arnout et al. reported four dislocations in a series of 1350 Journey BCS TKRs.

While one clinical study reported fewer dislocations associated with metal on metal implants, in the three largest national registries there was evidence of higher rates of implant revision associated with metal on metal implants compared with metal on polyethylene.

While one study reported fewer dislocations associated with metal on metal implants, three other trials did not support this finding, and the three largest national registries reported substantially higher occurrence of revision associated with metal on metal implants compared with metal on polyethylene bearing (fig 2).