Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A more recent trial [22] not included in that meta-analysis reported a small difference in sleep onset latency in favour of placebo, which was not statistically significant (8.3 minutes, 95% CI-0.3 CI-0.3 toinutes).
Su et al. [ 11] reported a small difference in estimates of additive variance between additive and dominance models.
Similar(58)
Of note, Cremer et al. reported a smaller difference in the average radial distance between CT-18 and CT-19 in DLD-1 nuclei (∼7.9%) and other tumor nuclei, while our analysis showed ∼18.4% difference between the means of the radial distance measurements of CT-18 and CT-19.
Yet based on genotype, we only report a small difference in muscle function in young white women and a difference in muscle size in older black women.
Some studies have reported either a smaller difference between men and women among younger adults [ 12], or an excess among younger adult women [ 11], as observed in our population.
In contrast, some less recent data report that there is only a small difference in the tidal volume (Vt) in response to hypercapnia in mdx mice at 7 months and little ventilation in mdx mice at 5 months of age [ 13, 15].
They did however report a small but statistically significant difference in salivary MS counts at 6 weeks that disappeared at 8 and 18 weeks.
Three previous studies have reported only small differences in transmission rates across different serotypes [ 7, 11, 12].
Overall, our results are in agreement with those of other authors who reported only small differences in the predictive performance of different statistical methods (Heslot et al. 2012).
Previous studies comparing ACD measurements obtained by optical and contact ultrasonic instruments reported small differences between different optical techniques (< 5%), yet larger differences (10 15%) have been reported with different contact ultrasonic techniques [ 23, 24].
Recently, Heslot et al.[ 18] reported similar small differences for seven parametric WGP models when comparing them for different presumable highly polygenic agronomic traits over eight datasets of barley, Arabidopsis thaliana, maize, and wheat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com