Exact(39)
In patients with known breast cancer, FDG-PET may be helpful in identifying involved axillary nodes with reported sensitivity of 94%[ 8] although other authors report sensitivity as low as 50%[ 9], in assessing brachial plexus pathology and detecting distant metastases.
We report sensitivity (d ′) and response criterion (c) from signal detection theory as dependent variables (Green & Swets, 1966).
In fact, many patients report sensitivity to shaving, hair brushing, wearing glasses and jewelry during a migraine attack.
17We also do not report sensitivity analyses that feature only linear effects and different specifications of the set of dummies, as they deliver the same message as the one reported in Appendix B: Table 4.
This is consistent with previous published studies, which report sensitivity rates of 87.5-10087.5-100%G PET-CT [10, 11] and 75-86 % for PET alone [9, 13, 15, 16].
We present comparisons of the sensitivity of the pesticide model in these scenarios in relation to previously reported results with the same model in other cases, and formulate proposals on a normalized format to report sensitivity results to facilitate comparisons among models and cases.
Similar(21)
Overall, fecal DNA studies report sensitivities from 62 to 91% for CRC compared to 15 80% for FOBT [6], [7].
Most studies report sensitivities of > 94% and specificities of > 99%.
Studies using contrast-enhanced helical CT report sensitivities between 65 and 82% [ 11– 13].
Some CFS sufferers report sensitivities to various chemicals or foods, including caffeine, refined sugar, tobacco, and alcohol.
The simulation results reported sensitivity and accuracy up to 98% with such combination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com