Sentence examples for report of experts from inspiring English sources

Though the judges did not immediately disclose their reasoning, they are likely to have been heavily influenced by the report of experts appointed by the court to review the forensic evidence.

On Dec. 12, 2008 the U.N. Security Council published the Final Report of Experts on the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Mr. Padilla refused to submit to psychological testing, so Dr. Buigas evaluated him by talking to him for about five hours, by examining his records and the reports of experts hired by the defense, and by questioning lawyers and brig officials.

Level IV evidence came from case series, and level V evidence came from expert opinions (case reports, descriptive or methodological studies, narrative or nonsystematic reviews, qualitative studies, audits, reports of expert committees, research letters, technical notes, and tutorials) and animal or laboratory studies.

Level III denotes evidence from opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies or reports of expert committees.

However, there is no high-quality medical evidence to demonstrate this: only Level III evidence exists – described in evidence-based medicine levels as the opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.

Besides the traditional format of a CC – including a two-day meeting with a jury listening to the reports of expert witnesses and then issuing a set of recommendations – we set up a process, already tested in previous CCs in Italy, whereby the two-day meeting comes at the end of highly structured and intense preparatory activities which are described in details below.

In addition, it is important to note that the support for the vancomycin trough concentration recommendations are graded as IIIB (moderate evidence for support and from opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees), which is rather soft [ 8].

Accordingly, a report of WHO experts suggested to drop the concept both for clinical and research purposes [ 6].

Of those who identified members, 27 (45 %) reported specialties of experts, 20 (32 %) described information of members, such as names and institutions, and four (7 %) gave the selection criteria.

The move follows the report of an expert group set up to advise on how to bring legal clarity to the issue.