Similar(8)
[Author's Response] I provide an extensive reply to this point with Reviewer 3.
A considerable number of students (34%) chose the reply "Don't know—No answer" on this point.
He recalled that Mr. Rangel replied: "At this point in my career, I don't care".
"It would add value to this paper is images of spinal cord staining was also shown" Reply: Done "Although the without primary images are very clean, using these antibodies on tissues not known to express these targets would be a more superior negative control" Reply: This point may rely on a possible misunderstanding.
(Naturally, I have asked the relevant officials at the Home Office for clarity on this point but without reply).
This argument is likely to offer a more telling reply to the critic than one that appeals to some other (alleged) kind of liberty (on this point, see Cohen 1988: chapter 14: 2914292).
Respondents were able to reply on a five point scale, ranging from 'not at all good' (1) to 'very good' (5).
Morgan insists on this point.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com