Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
However, the fold value for three replications ranged from 1.6 to 1.7 fold.
The total number of reads generated from each library (average of four biological replications) ranged from 7.3 to 8.3 million (Table 3).
The P values in the table were estimated by the replications ranged from 11 to 13. * indicates significant (P < 0.05) difference.
The normalized signal intensity of each sample was used to evaluate the reproducibility between three replications, and the correlation coefficients between any two replications ranged from 0.956 to 0.994, indicating that microarray analysis was highly reproducible in this study (See Additional file 1).
Similar(56)
TLR ligands had diverse effects on HIV-1 replication ranging from suppression of both R5 and X4 HIV-1 variants, through differential effects on R5 and X4 HIV-1 variants, to upregulation of both R5 and X4 HIV-1.
In contrast, cells transduced with the VRX494 antisense vector or the M589 vector expressing the maC46 fusion inhibitor demonstrated quite potent inhibition of viral replication, ranging between 3 and 4 logs of inhibition compared with control cells, even at the highest MOI studied.
As highlighted in this review, lipids serve to orchestrate different stages of viral replication, ranging from entry to spread.
Hence, we assessed an increase in viral replication ranging from 0.5 log10 to more than 1 log10 at the end of observation period (p = 0.00).
When comparing the most with the least effective DMP in a disease category, the vast majority of bootstrap replications (range:73%977) pointed to cost savings, except for COPD (21%).
The difference in mean 25(OH D levels between carriers of two copies of the minor allele versus those of none across the GWAS and replication studies ranged from −6.4 to −34.4% (median −18.3%; Table 2).
Total replications per state ranged from one to five during that time period.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com