Model 1 replicates the observed differences in log earnings trajectories between CE immigrants and the Canadian-born population, with the assumption that the earnings growth takes a quadratic function of years since the base year (YS) and the quadratic function is different between the two groups.
For each amino acid fragment that was detected in all biological replicates, the difference in average percent of uniformly labeled fragment was determined for samples grown with and without citrate.
However, in combining all replicates, the difference in the number of glycosylation sites that were identified in each replicate reflects an important advantage with regard to the number of unique identifications; thus, our experiments enhanced the coverage of the N-glycoproteome as much as possible.
Principal component analysis of conditions proved the good clusterization of samples (4 biological replicates) and consistence of the results between replicates, allowing the differences in steady-state mRNA levels between infected and non infected clams to be reliably measured.
Figure 4 shows the frequency distributions, for 1000 model replicates, of the differences in species-specific abundance between the Eastern Wood community and each model run, summed across all species.
This relationship is explicitly quantified by Quintin (2008), who shows that a model of limited enforcement calibrated to the US, by matching the measures of access to finance of some developing countries, can replicate the observed differences in average firm size between the US and Argentina and Mexico.
This functionality enables the camera to artificially replicate the slight differences in our own perception, which are responsible for things like spatial depth perception.
This analysis replicates the species differences observed in both the tools and causality scale and the theory of mind scale (theory of mind: F1,63 = 9.962, p = 0.002, bonobos > chimpanzees; tools and causality: F1,63 = 15.891, p<0.001, chimpanzees > bonobos).
For each technical replicate, the difference in the 10% trimmed mean intensity between the Mix1 and Mix2 data for analytes in the 1-to-1 component was calculated and used to correct the Mix2 signal data.
Our primary goal was to see if we could replicate the significant difference in tumor size found in the EE group by Cao et al., who injected B16F10 s.c. and found a 77% reduction in tumor mass in EE mice and that 17% of mice had no visible tumors, compared with 0% of mice in standard caging.
