For each amino acid fragment that was detected in all biological replicates, the difference in average percent of uniformly labeled fragment was determined for samples grown with and without citrate.
However, in combining all replicates, the difference in the number of glycosylation sites that were identified in each replicate reflects an important advantage with regard to the number of unique identifications; thus, our experiments enhanced the coverage of the N-glycoproteome as much as possible.
Model 1 replicates the observed differences in log earnings trajectories between CE immigrants and the Canadian-born population, with the assumption that the earnings growth takes a quadratic function of years since the base year (YS) and the quadratic function is different between the two groups.
This analysis replicates the species differences observed in both the tools and causality scale and the theory of mind scale (theory of mind: F1,63 = 9.962, p = 0.002, bonobos > chimpanzees; tools and causality: F1,63 = 15.891, p<0.001, chimpanzees > bonobos).
In the Test phase, we replicated the statistical difference between the experimental conditions from the last experiment (Fig. 3, bottom panel).
Immediately after stimulus onset (100 200 ms), 124/128 cells had bigger responses to the Eff image (level 10) than the Ineff image (level 0), replicating the response difference based on the longer epoch in which the Eff and Ineff image were defined.
Our primary goal was to see if we could replicate the significant difference in tumor size found in the EE group by Cao et al., who injected B16F10 s.c. and found a 77% reduction in tumor mass in EE mice and that 17% of mice had no visible tumors, compared with 0% of mice in standard caging.
In all the replicates, the differences were more pronounced at 6 dpi, when the disease phenotype was observed, than at 3 dpi (Figure 1C).
According to the standard deviation between replicates, the differences between simulated and estimated repeatability were still significant with 20 horses per event.
Because these studies should be considered conceptual replicates, the differences in results between them could either mean that one of the studies was in error, or that both studies were correct in the context of their methods [ 6].
This relationship is explicitly quantified by Quintin (2008), who shows that a model of limited enforcement calibrated to the US, by matching the measures of access to finance of some developing countries, can replicate the observed differences in average firm size between the US and Argentina and Mexico.
