Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
(The replicated F1- label score is 0.69 with standard deviation ±0.01, compared to YLoc+ reported F1- label score of 0.68, and the replicated accuracy is 0.65 with standard deviation ±0.01, compared to YLoc+ reported accuracy of 0.64).
Similar(59)
Kerr et al. found this to be true with 12 replicates, where accuracy is reduced if the error distribution for each gene is modeled separately instead of using a pooled estimate [ 15].
In each replicate, imputation accuracy was measured as the percentage of correctly imputed genotypes in the test population.
Previous work has demonstrated that LC-IM-DIA-MS presents no compromise in quantitative precision across sample replicates; however, some attenuation in quantitative accuracy is observed in proteins of higher abundance.
This problematic behavior is not apparent, however, when accuracy is measured only as the correspondence between the proportion of replicates in which some topology is true and the proportion of replicates from which it is inferred.
The correlation of biological replicates in our studies was >0.99, which indicates the technology is precise, although accuracy is undefined.
His accuracy is abysmal.
The accuracy is iffy.
Accuracy is important.
Accuracy is everything.
The accuracy is uncanny.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com