Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Repeating the same arguments as above, we can readily see that lim n → ∞ ∥ x n − x ∗ ∥ = 0.
Indeed, repeating the same arguments as in the proof of Proposition 3.4, we can derive the desired conclusion.
Repeating the same arguments as in the proof of Corollary 4.1, we can infer that Fix ( V ) = VI ( C, B 1 ).
Repeating the same arguments as those in the proof of Corollary 3.1, we can infer that Fix ( V ) = VI ( C, B 1 ).
Furthermore, repeating the same arguments as in (4.1) and (4.2), we can obtain that ∥ u ¯ n − p ∥ ≤ ∥ z n − p ∥ + λ n α n ∥ p ∥ (4.4).
Furthermore, repeating the same arguments as those of (5.29) in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we can derive lim n → ∞ ∥ x n − J r x n ∥ = 0, (5.59).
Similar(40)
Most of the men on the median were repeating the same argument as that in the square: a female President was forbidden by Islam.
A president who had governed from a statehouse, as most of Obama's recent predecessors have done, might have grasped right away the need to take the case to the local level, repeating the same argument for investment at every ribbon-cutting ceremony the White House could find.
Finally, repeating the same argument, we derive that u ∈ L p ∗ + p.
Repeating the same argument as above, we can derive z ∈ VI C, B).
(i) Repeating the same argument of Lemma 2.4(i), we conclude that (hat{alpha}^<0).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com