repeated instances to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "repeated instances to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to introduce a discussion about multiple occurrences of something, but it lacks a necessary complement to complete the thought. Example: "The report highlighted repeated instances to demonstrate the need for policy changes."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Whether colonization of multiple animals was due to repeated instances of human-to-animal transmission or whether animal-to-animal transmission may have occurred is not clear.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Sulzberger, as he said in a public statement issued Saturday, heard repeated reports from people in the Times newsroom in the past few years that Abramson was given to repeated instances of "arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues".

The New Yorker

Fowler said the human resources department at Uber punished her for alerting the company to the overt, repeated instances of sexual harassment, telling her to either find a new work team or accept negative performance reviews in the future.

Huffington Post

"There are repeated instances of MPs linked to the garment industry blocking stricter legislation," she said.

The Guardian

This suffering has led to repeated instances of popular protest directed against the Maduro administration.

The Guardian - Opinion

The jockeys, citing concerns for their safety, pointed to repeated instances in which horses owned by Gill broke down on the Penn National track since Oct. 1.

The New York Times - Sports

Fab Melo's repeated instances of ineligibility related to alleged academic issues.

Huffington Post

Thus, as will be described in detail below, in analysing our interviews we looked for references to repeated instances of interaction and interpretation that could eventually generate a norm that may in turn become internalized.

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Page B1 S.E.C. FAULTS CREDIT RATERS An examination of credit ratings agencies by the Securities and Exchange Commission found repeated instances of the companies failing to follow their own procedures or to adequately manage conflicts of interest, according to an S.E.C. staff report.

The New York Times

WASHINGTON — An examination of credit ratings agencies by the Securities and Exchange Commission found repeated instances of the companies failing to follow their own procedures or to manage conflicts of interest adequately, according to an S.E.C. staff report issued Friday.

The New York Times

But, for investigators, the most damning information relates to the repeated instances in which the company engaged in transactions that served no purpose other than to inflate the earnings Enron reported to investors and the public.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "repeated instances to" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, clarify the intended meaning by specifying what the instances relate to using prepositions like "of", "in", or "where".

Common error

The phrase "repeated instances to" often leaves the reader wondering what the instances are leading to. Always complete the phrase with a clear connection to the subsequent idea. For example, use "repeated instances of" followed by the specific issue or event.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "repeated instances to" is grammatically incomplete and does not function effectively as a connector or descriptor. Ludwig AI identifies this as an incorrect usage, highlighting the need for a preposition to create a grammatically sound phrase.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "repeated instances to" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear, defined usage in English. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, this phrase requires a preposition like "of", "in", or "where" to create a grammatically sound structure. Without it, the phrase fails to effectively communicate the intended meaning of multiple occurrences or examples. When writing, it's better to use alternative phrases such as ""multiple occurrences of"", ""frequent examples of"", or ""numerous cases of"" for better clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

multiple occurrences of

Focuses on the frequency of events, replacing "instances" with a more direct term.

frequent examples of

Emphasizes the illustrative nature of the occurrences.

numerous cases of

Highlights the variety and quantity of situations.

several incidents of

Specifies that the occurrences are events or happenings.

many situations involving

Shifts the focus to the context surrounding the instances.

recurring situations in

Highlights that the occurrences are events or happenings.

reiterated cases in

Specifies that the occurrences are events or happenings.

repeated events with

Highlights that the occurrences are events or happenings.

frequent situations involving

Shifts the focus to the context surrounding the instances.

multiple episodes within

Specifies that the occurrences are events or happenings.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "repeated instances" in a sentence?

The phrase "repeated instances" typically needs a preposition to connect it to what is being repeated. Common and grammatically sound alternatives include "repeated instances of", "repeated instances in", or "repeated instances where". For example, "repeated instances of failure" is correct.

What can I say instead of "repeated instances to"?

Consider using phrases like "multiple occurrences of", "frequent examples of", or "numerous cases of" to convey a similar meaning with better grammatical structure.

Is "repeated instances to" grammatically correct?

No, "repeated instances to" is not grammatically correct. It lacks a clear connection between the instances and what they relate to. Using "of", "in", or "where" after "repeated instances" creates a grammatically sound phrase.

How does the meaning change when using "repeated instances of" versus "repeated instances in"?

"Repeated instances of" generally refers to multiple occurrences of a specific thing or event, while "repeated instances in" usually refers to occurrences within a particular context or situation. For example, "repeated instances of errors" versus "repeated instances in the data".