Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Figure 4 demonstrates that repeat acquisitions at the same P T give similar TAC and TIC.
Of this subset, 88 exams with repeat acquisitions had at least one acquisition graded 1 (best quality).
There is limited clinical evidence as to the usefulness of repeat acquisitions and when they should be performed.
Repeat acquisitions performed due to operator-observed motion in the reconstructed image occurred for 22.7% of the exams (29.7% radius, 15.7% tibia).
In this study we present inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of a qualitative image quality grading score and report the prevalence of repeat acquisitions in our population.
Finally the errors in bone density and micro-architectural parameters estimated from repeat acquisitions with and without motion degradation are presented.
Similar(49)
There was a statistically significant increase in image quality between the first and the repeat acquisition (1,256 cases of increased quality at the repeated study (66%), 134 cases of decreased quality at the repeated study (7%), and 510 cases of unchanged quality (27%); P < 0.0001).
Mean time between the first and the repeat acquisition was 88 min (standard deviation 37 min).
The classifications made by the nuclear medicine technologists for the first and repeat acquisition are shown in Table 2.
In the present study, we found significantly higher quality in the repeat acquisition than in the first.
Table 7 shows the movements between the quality classes from the first to the repeat acquisition by reconstruction method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com