Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
removed redundant
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "removed redundant" is not correct in English as it lacks a necessary article or context.
You can use it in a context where you are discussing the elimination of unnecessary elements, but it should be phrased correctly. Example: "We removed the redundant sections from the report to streamline the information."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
28 human-written examples
After we represented the sequence fragments, we removed redundant feature vectors using the feature vector-based redundancy reduction method, which was developed in our previous study [ 14].
Science
The homology-based method identified redundancy in the raw contig set expressly and removed redundant contigs effectively.
Science
The ship was built to full scale, but Lamont removed redundant sections on the superstructure and forward well deck for the ship to fit in the tank, with the remaining sections filled with digital models.
Wiki
We then removed redundant gene/probe sets taking into account the ENTREZ, Unigene and RefSeq gene-id annotations.
Science
We then removed redundant markers using the algorithm of [9] and constructed three different panels of PCAIMs: P1 containing 500 markers, P2 containing 800 markers, and P3 containing 1,000 markers.
Science
We then removed redundant probe sets, and probe sets that showed minor differences in expression levels across all tests setting the standard deviation of the log2 signal over 67 conditions to less than 0.45.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
32 human-written examples
For removing redundant inequalities in Step 2, the redund method from the lrslib package v4.2 is used [ 51].
As each channel contains 70 characteristics, removing channel redundancy has more significance than removing redundant features.
That procedure can be used to remove redundant features.
Dimensionality reduction takes care of multicollinearity, by removes redundant features.
Science
This paper deals with the problem of removing redundant literals from a given clause.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for grammatical precision, replace "removed redundant" with "removed redundant elements/items/data", or better yet, use alternatives like "eliminated redundancy" or "discarded unnecessary items" for clearer and more accurate writing.
Common error
A common mistake is omitting the definite or indefinite article before "redundant", which leads to ungrammatical phrasing. Always specify what is being removed by adding a noun after "redundant" or rephrasing to "eliminated redundancy".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "removed redundant" typically functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of eliminating something considered unnecessary or repetitive. While Ludwig identifies this usage, it also notes the importance of grammatical correctness, suggesting the addition of a noun to complete the phrase.
Frequent in
Science
96%
Wiki
4%
News & Media
0%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "removed redundant" is relatively common, appearing in various scientific and technical contexts as shown by Ludwig, it is grammatically incorrect without a following noun. The phrase aims to communicate the action of eliminating unnecessary or repetitive elements to streamline a process or dataset. Ludwig AI points out that a more precise phrasing would include a noun (e.g., "removed redundant items") or rephrasing to something like "eliminated redundancy" for improved clarity and correctness. This avoids ambiguity and conforms to standard grammatical practices, especially in formal or professional writing. Given that a majority of examples come from academic or scientific publications, it is important to give careful consideration to this grammatical nuance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
eliminated redundancy
This alternative uses a noun instead of an adjective, focusing on the action taken against the redundancy.
cut out redundancies
Directly points to removing instances of repetition, emphasizing an active elimination process.
discarded unnecessary
This phrase emphasizes the disposal of elements that aren't needed, changing the focus from duplication to need.
deleted superfluous
This version replaces 'redundant' with 'superfluous', highlighting excess rather than mere repetition.
got rid of duplicates
This is an informal alternative focused on eliminating duplicate items.
streamlined processes
This choice shifts the focus to improving efficiency by removing what is not essential.
simplified structure
This phrase focuses on reducing complexity by removing unneeded elements.
trimmed excess
This option uses a more concise verb to show the reduction of extra elements.
whittled down
An informal phrase meaning to gradually reduce the size of something.
pruned back
Suggests a careful removal, similar to pruning a plant, implying selective elimination.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "removed redundant"?
The grammatically correct phrasing would include a noun after "redundant", such as "removed redundant items", "removed redundant data", or "removed redundant sections". Alternatively, you can rephrase it as "eliminated redundancy".
What are some alternatives to "removed redundant"?
Some alternatives include "eliminated redundancy", "discarded unnecessary", or "deleted superfluous", depending on the specific context.
Is "removed redundant" grammatically correct?
No, "removed redundant" is not grammatically correct on its own. It requires a noun following "redundant" to specify what has been removed. Omitting the noun results in an incomplete phrase.
When is it appropriate to use "removed redundant"?
While not grammatically ideal, "removed redundant" is often used in technical or scientific contexts where the meaning is clear from the surrounding text. However, for clearer and more formal writing, it is best to use alternatives like "eliminated redundancy" or specify what was removed, such as "removed redundant data".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested