remove with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "remove with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to indicate the action of removing something using a specific method or tool, but it lacks clarity without additional context. Example: "Please remove the stain with a damp cloth."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Remove with slotted spoon.

The New York Times

Remove with tongs and set aside.

Independent

Remove with slotted spoon and drain.

The New York Times - Food

Remove with slotted spoon and cool.

The New York Times - Food

Remove with a slotted spoon, and reserve.

The New York Times - Food

Remove with a slotted spoon and place to one side.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Massage in and remove with a hand-hot flannel.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Remove with a slotted spoon, and add to chicken soup.

The New York Times - Food

Remove with a slotted spoon on to kitchen roll.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Remove with a slotted spoon and keep warm.

The New York Times - Food

Remove with tongs, and transfer to ice water.

The New York Times - Food

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, always specify the tool or method used when describing the removal of something. For example, instead of "remove with a cloth", say "remove the stain with a damp cloth".

Common error

Avoid incomplete phrases such as "remove with" that lack specification. Always include the tool or method to ensure clarity, such as "remove the label with a scraper".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "remove with" functions as a directive, instructing someone to perform an action. However, as flagged by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically incomplete and requires further context to be clear. For instance, "remove with a cloth" directs the user to use a cloth for removal.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Wiki

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "remove with" is frequently used across various platforms, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect. To improve clarity and correctness, always specify the tool or method being used for removal. The phrase appears most often in News & Media, Wiki, and Science contexts. For better alternatives, consider phrases like "extract using" or "eliminate by means of" for clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

take away using

Similar to "remove with" but uses "take away" as a more casual alternative.

extract using

Specifies a method of extraction instead of a general removal.

clear with

Focuses on the act of clearing something using a specific tool or method.

eliminate by means of

Highlights the tool or method used for eliminating something.

clean off with

Suggests cleaning as the method of removal.

withdraw using

Focuses on the act of withdrawing something with assistance.

dislodge with

Implies forcibly removing something that is stuck or attached.

extract employing

More formal alternative, emphasizing the use of a specific tool or technique for extraction.

detach via

Specifies detaching as the action, highlighting the mechanism used.

pluck out with

Implies removing something with a picking motion using a tool.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "remove with" to make it grammatically correct?

To correct "remove with", specify the tool or method of removal. For example, use "remove the debris with a brush" or "remove the stain using a solvent".

What are some alternatives to "remove with" in a cooking context?

In cooking, you can use phrases like "take out with", "extract with", or "drain with depending on the context".

How does the phrase "remove with" differ from "eliminate with"?

"Remove with" generally implies a physical action of taking something away using a tool, while "eliminate with" suggests completely getting rid of something, often using a chemical or process.

Is "remove with" considered formal or informal language?

While frequently used, "remove with" lacks grammatical precision and is generally considered informal. More formal alternatives include "extract using" or "eliminate by means of".