Sentence examples for removal of weight from inspiring English sources

Compared to trabecular MS/BS (18.2±3.7%), MAR 1.2±0.11 µm/d), and BFR/BS (83.1±17.5 µm/yr) of age-matched controls, the removal of weight bearing (CTR) significantly (p<0.05) reduced indices of bone formation, as indicated by the 45% lower MS/BS, 52% lower MAR, and 74% lower BFR/BS (Fig. 1).

Thus, removal of weight bearing alone appears to have a different effect compared with the effect of removal of both weight bearing and the internal strain during muscle contraction (mechanical silencing) associated with the ICU intervention.

However, the removal of weight from the total hip model had only a small effect on the magnitude and significance of the time × group interaction and marginally increased the difference between the groups (data not presented).

The removal of weight-bearing from the skeleton as a consequence of spaceflight, bedrest, paraplegia, or aging adversely affects the mass and architecture of trabecular bone [1], [2].

But the increased gum loss was much higher than the effect of protein removal on weight loss.

Flexible flatfoot is a condition in which the medial longitudinal arch of the foot collapses during weight bearing and restores after removal of body weight [ 1, 2].

Indeed removal of birth weight from the model only changed the parameter estimate of the effect of offspring inbreeding coefficient from -9.74 ± 2.29 to -8.68 ± 2.47.

Removal of age weights yielded 814,934 DALYs(3,0), whereas removal of age weights and the discount rate yielded 1,557,121 DALYs(0,0) (Table 4).

These were nicotine replacement therapy, which shifted from not cost effective to potentially cost effective with the removal of age weights, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for acute myocardial infarction, which shifted from potentially cost effective to highly cost effective; both of these shifts were based on relatively small changes in the ratios.

However, adsorption of high molecular weight proteins is relatively a slow process as their adsorption involves removal of low molecular weight proteins that diffuse much faster to a surface than high molecular weight mucins [ 31].

Limitations: Removal of low-molecular weight ionic contaminations, Non-charged, higher molecular weight, and less mobile ionic species cannot be significantly removed by the process, Large membrane areas are required to satisfy capacity requirements for low concentration (and sparingly conductive) feed solutions.