Sentence examples for removal of rules from inspiring English sources

But deregulation is by definition about the removal of rules.

The W.T.O., charged with defining and enforcing deregulation, is only concerned with rules that regulate the removal of rules.

"For an administration that professes to support removal of rules and regulations that impede domestic energy production — not to mention supporting American agriculture — this is the opposite of that promise," Doug Sombke, president of the South Dakota Farmers Union, and National Farmers Union President Roger Johnson said in a joint letter to Pruitt.

The analysis indicates that a policy combining increased opportunity for hospital choice with the removal of rules restricting referrals can reduce waiting times for individual elective patients.

In Norway, the reform, which came into effect in 2001, also meant a removal of rules restricting referrals to providers within a single district, thereby creating a competitive referral system for elective care [ 7, 8].

The recent removal of rule 500, which made it hard for NYSE-listed firms to switch to other exchanges, might now increase Nasdaq's threat.But the mistake Mr Grasso thinks may have cost the NYSE most has been its failure to recognise that its greatest assets are its data.

We also describe an algorithm for the automatic detection and removal of redundant rules.

The standard approach to this problem, consisting in the removal of redundant rules from a knowledge base, leads to an "irredundant" but not necessarily optimal knowledge base.

FCC chairman Ajit Pai called it "the start of a new chapter in... how we... maintain a free and open Internet," arguing that the removal of the rules will spur innovation in Internet provision.

Mr. Bush has argued that a conservative approach to education for 21st-century jobs would embrace more effective teacher evaluation and common core standards, but add a bigger element of choice in the form of charter schools and vouchers, the removal of union rules that limit new technology — and combine it all with greater autonomy and accountability for individual principals.

However, communications giants also promised not to throttle content if freed from the 2015 federal protections, and lobbied ruthlessly for the removal of national rules, so perhaps they should have thought of states' likely reactions first.