Sentence examples for removal dose from inspiring English sources

Kt/V remains the common available method of monitoring solute removal dose of IHD or SLED in AKI patients.

In order to determine whether Src is required for the spontaneous generation of CR-CaP in the CWR22 model, CWR22 xenografts were grown to ∼250 mm in T-pelleted, castrated male nude mice, then treated for 28 days (starting 1 day before T-pellet removal) with doses of dasatinib or KXO1 (vs. vehicle) (Fig. 1A) previously shown to inhibit Src-driven tumor growth in vivo [ 10, 36].

Figure 2 shows the degradation kinetic profile of 5, 7.5 and 10 ppm initial concentrations of lindane as a function of time and time course profile for lindane removal by FeSO4 dose of 20 mg ml−1 and H2O2 dose of 142 mg ml−1 at a pH value of 3. At initial lindane concentrations of 5, 7.5 and 10 ppm, ~5, 27 and 14%% degradation was observed within 2-min reaction time.

Figure 1 depicts the kinetic profile of endosulfan degradation (5, 7.5 and 10 ppm initial concentrations) as a function of time for endosulfan removal by FeSO4 dose of 50 mg ml−1 and H2O2 dose of 236 mg ml−1 at initial pH 3. At initial endosulfan concentrations of 5, 7.5 and 10 ppm, ~3, 60 and 50 % disappearance, respectively, was witnessed within 2 min of the reaction time.

Prior findings in vitro of a TGF-β3 dependent mechanism induced by low dose-rate irradiation and resulting in increased radioresistance and removal of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) was tested in an in vivo model.

If the lowest known strain coverage (66%, Canada) is combined with the assumption of no herd effects (fig 5), the only cost effective strategies are those in infants with removal of a dose of meningococcal vaccine with a vaccine price of £1-2 a dose.

For 85% fluoride removal, the optimum dose of adsorbent was found to be 1.25 g/100 mL.

The dependence of the damage build-up and removal on ion dose and annealing temperature was quantitatively analyzed.

The normalized importance analysis in ANN predicts Cd2+ concentration, and pH has the most influence in removal than biomass dose and time.

Temperature had an effect on SMO and Bright-Edge 80 removal while adsorbent dose was found to influence the removal of SMO.

Increasing removal with biosorbent dose might be attributed to increase in biosorbent surface area with subsequent increment of more active binding sites (King et al. 2008; Kamsonlian et al. 2012; Das et al. 2014).