Sentence examples for remitting less from inspiring English sources

Overall, irregular legal status seems to constrain remitting less than short returns: the proportion of Senegalese migrants who remit is never under 50%%, whatever the destinations and legal-status categories (Table 1).

In addition, this figure shows that legal status can operate through short returns to constrain non-mobile transnational activities: migrants who lack secure legal status and, as a result, do not visit the homeland engage in remitting less frequently.

Therefore, they tend to remit less and to favor savings ex ante.

Long-term émigrés tend to remit less than more recent arrivals.

Earlier cohorts may remit less than more recent arrivals because they may no longer have close family members in Cuba.

Or, other siblings may be more educated and/or earn more and yet choose to remit less, if at all.

If assimilation forces are consequential, as the assimilation thesis predicts, then Late Exiles should remit less than Mariels, given the former group's longer stay in the US.

Migrants with irregular statuses remit less, indicating that their lack of secure legal status directly blocks them from cross-border action (Table 1).

Similarly, English proficient migrants and those engaged in social organizations –often byproduct of longer migration experiences and greater assimilation, are less likely to remit and remit less if they send money to their families in Mexico.

More specifically, we show that migrants forming high expectations about the benefits of migration tend to remit less to save more.6 Also migrants whose labor market outcomes are relatively risky in the host country tend to remit more.

For instance, a sibling may remit less because he/she expects siblings with higher education levels, owing to higher levels of investment by the household of origin, to remit more.