Sentence examples for remarkable differences compared from inspiring English sources

The TC of [Bmim][PF6] and [Bmim][PF6] containing CTABr (5 mM) in Figure 11a is both slightly temperature-dependent and the later is no remarkable differences compared with the former, indicating the low amount of CTABr has no obvious effects on the TC of [Bmim][PF6].

Of these, the epidemiology of C. parapsilosis shows remarkable differences compared with C. albicans.

We therefore undertook precise temperature-controlled studies which showed remarkable differences compared to the sulfite system.

Both satellite cells and muscle have the same embryological origin and, even though experiments in vitro and in vivo have suggested that myoblasts have low or absent levels of mutation, understanding the mechanism of this remarkable difference compared with the mature muscle might facilitate different therapeutic strategies to help patients with mitochondrial myopathies.

Note that the classical RK4 uses only the approximate value (phi_{m}) at time (t_{m}) to calculate (phi_{m+1}), whereas algorithm (12) uses the value ({tilde{phi}}_{m}:=phi_{m}+e_{m}) instead of (phi_{m}), which is a remarkable difference compared to the RK4.

A remarkable difference compared to other methods used so far for the analog transmission of signals via optical means, is that the input stage of the OCCM, the only one that remains at the detector side, is passive; therefore, it does not require to be powered.

This was a remarkable difference compared with the rejection of purely reflective portfolios.

Single mutants did not show remarkable catalytic differences compared with wild type Ron (data not shown).

The template-based AC method proposed by our group does not show any remarkable differences when compared to ECAT data (results not shown here).

In this study, we evaluated the phylogenetic performance of individual mt genes in recovering caenogastropod phylogeny, and found some remarkable differences when compared with results from the above-mentioned studies in vertebrates.

Eight (57.1%) of these patients had an anthracycline-free interval >12 months, nine (64.2%) were classified as having non-anthracycline-resistant disease, and seven (50%) were taxane naive, resulting in no remarkable differences when compared with the full patient population.