Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Patients who discontinued INH due to unavoidable reasons (pregnancy, index case with INH-resistant TB, death from unrelated causes, patient relocation) were excluded.
Similar(59)
Two volunteers who did not complete study visits after relocation to the urban campus were excluded from data analysis, leaving a total of 39 participants.
Among these, 128 were excluded due to relocation or being lost-to-follow-up, twin delivery, death of infant or mother before 3 weeks after birth.
Of the 353 patients (68.3%%) who returned a completed form, eight were excluded due to relocation (n = 5), death (n = 1), or refusal to participate (n = 2).
Among these, 139 were excluded due to relocation or being lost-to-follow-up, twin delivery, death of the infant or mother before 3 weeks after birth, or severe malformations (additional file 1, figure S1).
At the 3-week assessment the mother-infant pairs were assessed and a total of 139 were excluded due to relocation or being lost-to-follow-up (95), stillbirth (9), twin delivery (11) or death of the infant (23) or mother (1) before 3 weeks after birth.
Among the 514 pregnant women who composed the initial cohort, 10 were excluded because of miscarriage, stillbirth, relocation, or voluntary withdrawal from the study before follow-up.
Exclusion criteria included participation in another psychological treatment programme and an inability to finish the treatment due to relocation – several people changed their accommodation unpredictably and so were excluded.
In total, 56.16% of patients (54 patients) within the control group had not completed the follow-up visits for various reasons (relocation, impairment because of age, follow-up performed elsewhere) and therefore were excluded.
Ten registered women were excluded due to miscarriage and stillbirth (n = 2), relocation (n = 1), or voluntary withdrawal (n = 7) from the study before follow-up.
During the relocation process, we isolated readings with arrival-time residuals exceeding 2 s and these observations were excluded from later stages.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com