relocated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relocated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as it suggests a relationship that doesn't fit the context of relocation. Example: "The family was relocated with their belongings to a new city."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These data exclude 12 original sites and 85 boulders at sites impacted by the fire that could not be relocated, with a reasonable cause for the lack of relocation being boulder obliteration by the fire.

Geomorphology

He later relocated with his parents to New York City.

The New York Times

Some of his neighbors have relocated, with one moving to the southern Japanese island of Okinawa.

Harvard University

Aged 10, Moore relocated with her family to Stratford, east London.

The Guardian

Aged 10 Moore relocated with her family to Stratford, east London.

The Guardian

This year alone, 600 more families will be involuntarily relocated with Section 8 housing vouchers, the suit says.

The New York Times

When the towers were torn down, she relocated with her children to an apartment on the West Side.

The New York Times - Magazine

His mother remarried and relocated with her new husband to Puerto Rico, where he worked for the airlines.

The New York Times - Magazine

In 1972, Mr. Recio relocated with his children and wife, Eugenia, to Spain, where they moved in with relatives.

The New York Times

In late 2015, both Yob and Eilon relocated with their families to the U.S. Virgin Islands, voter registration records show.

The Washington Post

One of a tranche of former Johnson inmates now relocated with Ireland's champion trainer, he may not be seen until the second half of the season.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a relocation, consider using clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "moved along with", "transferred with", or "accompanied by" to ensure your writing is precise and easily understood.

Common error

Be careful when using "relocated with". This phrase can sound awkward and is often flagged as grammatically incorrect. Always opt for more precise language that clearly indicates who or what is being relocated and who or what is accompanying them.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relocated with" functions as a connector, aiming to link the act of relocating to an accompanying entity. However, Ludwig AI flags it as is not correct in standard English. Better alternatives should be used to clearly express accompaniment during relocation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

34%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "relocated with" appears frequently across diverse sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically is not correct. Its purpose is to describe a movement in conjunction with something else, but it often lacks the precision needed for clear communication. Alternatives like "moved along with", "transferred with", or "accompanied by" offer improved accuracy. Although the phrase is common, especially in news and scientific contexts, writers should opt for more precise language to ensure clarity. The expert rating reflects the need for better grammatical choices despite its common usage. This analysis suggests careful consideration should be given to alternative phrasing to improve writing quality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

moved along with

Emphasizes the act of moving in conjunction with someone or something else. It's a more direct and commonly accepted way to describe accompanying someone during a relocation.

transferred with

Focuses on the transfer of an object or person, indicating a formal or organized movement.

moved in conjunction with

Highlights the simultaneous movement of entities, useful for emphasizing coordination.

accompanied by

Stresses the idea of one thing or person being together with another during a move, clarifying the relationship.

shifted alongside

Suggests a parallel movement, indicating a change in position while maintaining proximity.

repositioned together with

Highlights a deliberate act of repositioning multiple items or individuals as a unit.

displaced in company with

Implies a forced or necessary relocation, emphasizing the presence of others during the displacement.

reestablished jointly with

Indicates a mutual effort to resettle or rebuild in a new location, stressing collaboration.

relocated in tandem with

Indicates simultaneous movement, useful for emphasizing coordination or synchronization.

migrated in conjunction with

Suggests a large-scale movement often associated with people or animals moving from one region to another.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "relocated with"?

Instead of "relocated with", consider using phrases like "moved along with", "transferred with", or "accompanied by" for clearer communication.

Is "relocated with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "relocated with" is generally considered grammatically is not correct. It's advisable to use alternative phrasing for improved clarity and correctness.

How can I use "moved along with" instead of "relocated with"?

You can replace "relocated with" with "moved along with" to indicate that someone or something moved in conjunction with someone else. For example, "The family moved along with their belongings to a new city".

What are some alternatives to "relocated with" that emphasize accompaniment?

If you want to emphasize that someone or something accompanied the relocated person or thing, use phrases like "accompanied by" or "in the company of".