Sentence examples for reliable reasoning from inspiring English sources

Gil Harman and Sanjeev Kulkarni's Reliable Reasoning (2007) adopts a view of induction very close to Reichenbach's.

One of them is the difficulty in specifying the required level of expressivity, so that reliable reasoning can be implemented, which is needed at the minimum to be able to check the consistency of the terminology, and beyond, to ensure the reliable implementation of clinical decision models.

Specifically, Plantinga claims that evolution cannot account for the rise of reliable reasoning faculties.

Plantinga argues that whereas a God would be expected to create beings with reliable reasoning faculties, evolution would be just as likely to lead to unreliable ones, meaning that if evolution is true, it is irrational to trust whatever reasoning one relies on to conclude that it is true.

"On the technical side, we have a lot of challenges in terms of reliable perception, reasoning, and scene understanding in order to realize a true transportation solution, and an intelligent robot that can help people age in place".

Our purpose was (1) to provide a rigorous and reliable diagnosis reasoning process for guiding an early and targeted management susceptible to modify the prognosis and (2) to identify factors associated with ICU- and 90-day mortality.

According to Bishop, the generality problem will arise for any theory that allows for the possibility of reflective justification that is, having a belief B that is justified on the basis of one's knowledge that one formed B via a reliable form of reasoning.

It was composed of three sets of directions asking the students to search for information online, determine which sites were reliable and explain their reasoning.

Today's ontology applications require efficient and reliable description logic (DL) reasoning services.

It was essential for students to recognize the various connections in logical thinking so that they could identify faulty reasoning, identify reliable evidence and construct explanations before they could refute or support a hypothesis – these were essential science process skills that fostered scientific inquiry (Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD], 2013).

Previous studies have demonstrated that recruiting more than 10 members in a reference panel presents a reliable assessment of clinical reasoning with the SC test and using more than 20 members shows only a marginal benefit in terms of psychometrics properties [ 13, 17].