No defender of a reliable process theory of justification is apt to regard reliability as determined merely by the actual frequency of true versus false belief production or sustenance.
This important point about how to best understand reliability, however, will not affect the point just made concerning reliable process theories and externalism regarding justification.
"It's a robust, repeatable, reliable process".
It is nearby and offers a reliable process.
New standards were adopted, for example, for eyewitness identification, creating, according to Lake, a "much more reliable process".
Fact-checking would have caught my mistake had a case of crossed wires not bollixed our usually reliable process.
Identifying all individuals possessing the privilege and responsibility to provide the advisory board with the best information available will be a vital step toward a more reliable process.
A reliable process has been obtained from these experiments.
Proceeding under these constraints, Goldman was led to the reliable process theory as follows.
Once again we can illustrate such a position by considering a reliable process theory of justification.
Instead, they used a kind of reasoning that Hudson refers to as "reliable process reasoning".
