Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Reliability of the intention measure was high (r = 0.93).
Similar(59)
Internal consistency of the extended TPB measures was satisfactory with reliabilities (Cronbach's α) of the Intention, Attitude, Subjective norm and Perceived Behavioural Control scales >0.65 and the Anticipated regret scale >0.5 (Pearson's correlation coefficient).
Moreover, the reliability of intention as a predictor of actual behavior remains controversial.
This requires three simple questions: for each partner, the respondent is asked "Are you still sexually active with this partner?" or "Do you expect to have sex with this partner again?" While this raises reasonable concerns about the validity and reliability of "intention" questions – after all, who can predict the future?
Although the internal consistency reliability of intention was satisfactory, this is a measure of on the spot reliability.
The Chinese version demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability of 0.84 for intention, 0.81 for attitude, and 0.74 for subjective norms.
Few of the original studies reported intention to treat analyses, and that reduces the reliability of the data included in this meta-analysis.
Was that part of the intention?
not the continued awareness of the intention.
Findings from the analysis confirmed the reliability of the scale and validated the influence of the Theory of Reasoned Action in predicting consumer's attitude and buying intention.
Many questioned the reliability of the survey.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com