Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Internal consistency reliability of the dimensions proved to be excellent.
Internal consistency reliability of the dimensions of the PACT-Q was again evaluated, by determination of the Cronbach's alpha coefficient [ 17].
The reliability of the dimensions 5, 11, and 13 was low (Cronbach's alpha < 0.6) so these were excluded from further analysis.
The final version of the FGVS showed good psychometric properties, including good item convergent and discriminant validity and good internal consistency reliability of the dimensions as well as sub-dimensions.
The internal consistency reliability of the dimensions [ 16], i.e. the extent to which individual items are consistent with each other and reflect a single underlying construct, was assessed by the determination of Cronbach's alpha coefficient [ 17].
As can be seen in Table 3, Cronbach's alpha of the APQ dimensions ranged from.74 to.86, indicating either acceptable (α ≥ .70) or good (α ≥ .80) reliability of the dimensions [ 31].
Similar(54)
The factor structure was further verified by reanalyzing the reliability of the dimension.
For this purpose the discrimination and reliability of the dimension sub-scales would be of interest: if the sub-scales are unreliable or fail to discriminate between patients then they will be of doubtful value to inform focused interventions.
The limited practical use of the conditional dimensions Employment Concerns and Relationship Concerns, whether the patient is partnered or not, did not make possible to provide evidence of validity and reliability of these dimensions as the subsets of sample to work with were not large enough.
The reliability indices of the dimensions ranged from a low of.65 for personal aspect of learning which had only two items to a high of.93 for the technical aspect of departmental perspective.
Considering the profound theoretical background of CSA, and also regarding the difference in the reliability of the two dimensions of the test, some suggestions are presented in this paper to improve the validity and reliability of CSA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com