reliability of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'reliability of' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are talking about the dependability or trustworthiness of something or someone. For example: "The reliability of the car made it a popular choice for drivers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Reliability of the method.

Cornell University

Did this subvert "the reliability of knowledge"?

The New Yorker

The reliability of these reports is unclear.

Independent

Reliability of MINUIT error estimates.

Stanford University

Many questioned the reliability of the survey.

The New York Times

The reliability of strategic information is declining.

The New York Times

Reliability of the IP MS methods.

Nature

Test the reliability of your data.

Harvard Business Review

Measurement and reliability of response inhibition.

Nature

"What I care about is the reliability of the partner".

The New York Times

She said she liked the reliability of video surveillance records.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "reliability of" data, always specify the methods used to assess that reliability, such as statistical tests or cross-validation techniques.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "reliability of" in contexts where the reliability hasn't been properly assessed or is based on anecdotal evidence. Providing unsupported claims undermines credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reliability of" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as a subject complement or within a prepositional phrase. It signifies an attribute or characteristic of something, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Science

3%

News & Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reliability of" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to convey the dependability or trustworthiness of something. According to Ludwig AI, it's most commonly encountered in news and media, scientific research, and academic writing. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly defines what is being assessed and that any claims about reliability are supported by evidence. As Ludwig's examples indicate, discussing the "reliability of" something often involves examining the methods, data, and sources used to assess its dependability. Remember that alternatives like "degree of trustworthiness" or "level of dependability" can be used to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

dependableness factor

Highlights the importance of being able to count on something.

level of dependability

Emphasizes the capacity to be relied upon consistently.

consistency rating

Focuses on evaluating the uniformity and regularity of something.

degree of trustworthiness

Focuses on the extent to which something is worthy of trust, rather than its dependability.

assurance of consistency

Stresses the guaranteed uniformity or stability over time.

measure of accuracy

Shifts the focus to how precise something is, especially in measurements or results.

certitude of performance

Highlights the guaranteed level of execution or function.

extent of validity

Highlights the accuracy and factual correctness of something.

integrity strength

Focuses on the robustness and uncompromised nature of something.

predictability quotient

Emphasizes the ability to forecast outcomes or behavior.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "reliability of" in a sentence?

You can use "reliability of" to discuss the degree to which something is dependable or trustworthy. For example: "The "reliability of the data" is crucial for accurate analysis."

What are some alternatives to saying "reliability of"?

Alternatives include "degree of trustworthiness", "level of dependability", or "extent of validity" depending on the specific context.

How do you assess the "reliability of" a source?

Assessing the "reliability of" a source involves checking its author's credentials, verifying its publication date, and looking for evidence of bias. Cross-referencing with other reliable sources is also essential.

What is the difference between "reliability of" and "validity of"?

"Reliability of" refers to the consistency and repeatability of results, whereas "validity of" refers to the accuracy and whether the results truly measure what they are intended to measure.