Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
In clinical settings it seems advisable that patients are rated by the same therapist as intra-observer reliability is better than inter-observer reliability.
The reliability is better with the original scale, as is measuring plantar flexion of the ankle compared with measurement of more proximal muscles [ 15, 17].
The reliability is better with the original scale, as used in the present study (Nuyens et al. 1994, Hass et al. 1996).
The results of the current study also corroborate the observations of the other researchers that intra-rater reliability is better than inter-rater reliability [ 2, 6, 7, 23, 25, 26, 28, 33].
Similar(56)
Intra-rater reliability was better for the experienced rater (ICC = 0.68 0.99) than the inexperienced rater (ICC = 0.38 0.97).
Similar to our study, the inter-rater reliability was better for case scenarios (kappa = 0.77 vs. 0.84) compared to actual cases (kappa = 0.57 vs. 0.82).
Intra-observer reliability was better and could be scored as high or good for both directions, with a correlated improved reliability of the pressure characteristics.
From comparison, it is observed that the values of the system reliability are better than the existing results in all three examples.
Test retest reliability was better than inter-rater reliability.
The intra-rater reliability was better than the inter-rater reliability.
Overall, retest reliability was better when the retest time was shorter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com