Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(59)
Studies that were identified as potentially relevant were then retrieved where possible and independently screened for relevance.
This would not be especially relevant were The Reader not partly about, well, reading.
The most relevant were probably race, gender, age and education levels, in about that order.
Even questions that might seem more relevant were no easier to answer because of the tremendous fluctuations that are a normal part of most mental health conditions.
Perhaps these factors would be relevant were Prasetyo victim of a specific hate crime relating to her occupation, or her background.
Titles that appeared relevant were assessed for inclusion.
Even more relevant were temporal changes of the urban species structure.
Full published manuscripts of studies considered relevant were retrieved and reviewed.
Less relevant were the granulation solution and the grade of PVP.
The recall was 0.65, meaning that 65% of the documents actually relevant were effectively classified as relevant.
Similar(1)
Nonverbal communications that seemed relevant were also noted, such as laughter and long pauses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com