Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Unfortunately, a relevant systematic review is unavailable.
The references of eligible studies, relevant systematic reviews, and meta-analysis were also manually retrieved.
We also screened the references from all included studies and relevant systematic reviews.
As our preliminary search found several relevant systematic reviews, it was deemed feasible to undertake a meta-review [9].
Screening of references listed in relevant systematic reviews and hand searches of journals that were the source of at least 10% of the relevant articles were also employed.
In total 17 relevant systematic reviews were included [12], [21], [36].
Titles and abstracts were then screened by one of us (NA) to identify the relevant systematic reviews.
78 79 Our searches also identified 16 relevant systematic reviews.
We identified a relevant systematic review published in 1997.
Relevant systematic reviews and longitudinal analyses of change were examined.
Scoping searches for relevant systematic reviews were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com