Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
The full-text articles of potentially relevant studies were reviewed; only randomized clinical trials were included.
All titles and abstracts of relevant studies were reviewed with a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Abstracts for remaining relevant studies were reviewed.
Fifty-eight relevant studies were reviewed.
All potentially relevant studies were reviewed in full to determine eligibility (see Figure 1).
The reference lists of the relevant studies were reviewed for possible missing citations.
Similar(49)
The full text of all potentially relevant studies was reviewed to determine if they fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
Relevant studies are reviewed by Thornton and Lee (1998).
Relevant published studies were reviewed for additional keywords and synonyms.
Relevant cost effectiveness studies were reviewed to check for empirical data that met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1).
Hand searching was conducted in relevant scientific journals, scientific meetings, and the reference lists of relevant reviews and included studies were reviewed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com