Sentence examples for relevant studies lacking from inspiring English sources

Although the titles of articles lacking an abstract were screened and the full-text retrieved where appropriate, there is the possibility that relevant studies lacking an abstract may have been missed; non-English language articles lacking an English abstract were not included.

They are, in general, non-standardized, open, non-controlled studies and at times the studies lack relevant clinical information data, such as the effective duration of the treatment, the dosage of tested drugs and the patient follow-up.

It is possible that we have missed some relevant studies considering the lack of specific indexing terms for commercial driving and the varying terminology of the fitness-to-drive examination.

In short, the SoP is a complex undergraduate genre with occluded and self-promotional features, which partially accounts for the lack of relevant studies within the genre literature.

The limitation of coordination between cloudlets is illustrated by the lack of relevant studies, despite the extensive discussion of cloudlets and cloud computing.

This possibility, however, remains speculative and cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of relevant studies; therefore, individual assessment should be considered in future studies.

However, a systematic review of the literature found that given the lack of relevant studies, it is difficult to determine the efficacy of social worker delivered CBT for depression and anxiety [ 25].

However, a systematic review of the literature had found that given the lack of relevant studies, it is difficult to determine the efficacy of social worker delivered CBT for depression and anxiety [ 25].

This was because there was often no available systematic review evidence, or where there was a systematic review, it identified a lack of relevant studies to answer the question.

While the present authors were unable to assess the impact of diabetes duration on cognitive function due to a lack of relevant studies, it is noteworthy that small, but reliable cognitive differences are documented in this meta-analysis of children who have an average disease duration of just 5.23 years.

Their findings are similar to that of Donegan and colleagues, suggesting that the main methodological problems included unclear understanding of assumptions, incomplete inclusion of relevant studies, flawed or inappropriate methods, lack of similarity assessment and inappropriate combination of direct and indirect evidence.