relevant document for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relevant document for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to documents that are relevant to a particular topic or issue. For example, "We studied the relevant document for understanding the effects of COVID-19 on the economy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Yet the most extraordinary feature of Clark's Memoir, making it a thoroughly relevant document for our own time, has to do precisely with being American.

University of Chicago

By reading each relevant and non-relevant document a person with domain knowledge could gain a good understanding of what constituted a relevant document for this researcher.

BioData Mining

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

All researchers must submit copies of data and relevant documents for long-term archiving at the Forest.

Harvard University

A good start for any data-gathering phase of a project is to compile all relevant documents for the project team to examine.

Security Convergence Managing Enterprise Security Risk

Relevant documents for this opinion were identified through a search of the English literature for publications, including one or more of the keywords "accreta" or "increta" or "percreta" and "preterm" and "delivery time" by the use of PubMed (U.S. National Library Of Medicine, January 1990-January 2010), with results limited to studies involving humans.

Seminars in Perinatology

Query expansion helps to find more relevant documents for a given query.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

According to officials the relevant documents for the flight had not been completed.

BBC

Precision/recall are defined in terms of a set of retrieved documents by a given approach and a set of relevant documents for a certain topic.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

The resulting classification score, henceforth referred to as 'ChEMBL-likeness', is used to prioritise relevant documents for data extraction and curation during the triage process.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Harman [12, 36] studies how to assign scores to terms extracted from relevant documents for a given query Q so that high scored terms are used to expand the original query and improve precision of information retrieval strategy.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

begin{aligned} {text{ MAP}} = frac{1}{k}sum _{q=1}^kP_mathrm{q} end{aligned} (7)(P_mathrm{q}) is defined by Eq. 8, where (m) is the number of retrieved documents for the query (q, n) is the number of relevant documents for the query (q) and (r_{mathrm{q}_i}) is a binary function indicating whether the (i th document is relevant or not for the query (q).

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "relevant document for", ensure that the connection between the document and its relevance is clear to the reader to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what purpose the document serves.

Common error

Avoid using "relevant document for" without specifying the context. Instead of saying 'This is a relevant document for the project', clarify by stating 'This document is relevant for understanding the project's initial goals'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relevant document for" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun and indicating the document's suitability or importance concerning a specific context or purpose. Ludwig examples show its common usage in academic, scientific, and professional settings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "relevant document for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression across diverse fields like science, news, and academia. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to pinpoint a document's pertinence to a specific subject or objective. To enhance clarity, it's advisable to specify the document's role or purpose, avoiding overgeneralization. Alternative phrases, such as "important document for" or "applicable document for", can be employed to fine-tune the emphasis, while the plural "relevant documents for" is suitable when discussing multiple sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

relevant material for

Replaces "document" with "material", broadening the scope to include non-documentary items.

relevant documents for

Pluralizes "document" to "documents", indicating multiple relevant items.

relevant evidence for

Substitutes "document" with "evidence", focusing on the evidentiary aspect.

relevant text for

Replaces "document" with "text", emphasizing the textual content's relevance.

relevant texts for

Changes the noun "document" to "texts", indicating more than one relevant text.

relevant paperwork for

Substitutes "document" with "paperwork", highlighting the administrative or formal nature.

relevant reports for

Replaces "document" with "reports", specifying a type of relevant material.

relevant files for

Substitutes "document" with "files", suggesting digital or organized collections.

interesting document for

Changes "relevant" to "interesting", shifting the focus from importance to intrigue.

valuable document for

Substitutes "relevant" with "valuable", emphasizing the worth or benefit of the document.

FAQs

How can I use "relevant document for" in a sentence?

Use "relevant document for" to specify a document's importance or applicability to a particular topic or task. For instance, "The study is a /s/relevant+document+for understanding the impact of climate change".

What are some alternatives to using "relevant document for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "important document for", "applicable document for", or "key resource for". Each alternative slightly changes the nuance, so choose the one that best fits your context.

Is it correct to say "relevant documents for" instead of "relevant document for"?

Yes, "relevant documents for" is correct when referring to multiple documents. The choice depends on whether you're discussing a single document or a collection of documents.

What's the difference between "relevant to" and "relevant document for"?

"Relevant to" describes a general relationship, while "relevant document for" specifically indicates a document's usefulness in achieving a particular purpose. For example, evidence can be relevant to the case.