Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Only salient points of figures should be commented in the text if they are used to support a relevant deduction.
Similar(59)
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 3 are given below.
The relevant deductions for Equations 6, 17, and 20 can be obtained in an analogous way.
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 10 are provided in Appendix B. The expectation of intra-domain handoff latency of HMIPv6 in RO mode is given by: (11).
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 3 are provided in Appendix A. Assume that every link uses the OSPF (open shortest path first) algorithm to route packets.
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 6 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 3 as shown in Appendix A. HMIPv6 classifies handoff into intra-domain handoff and inter-domain handoff.
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 17 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 3 as shown in Appendix A. The handoff latency expectation of CNLP in RO mode is: (18).
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 20 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 3 as shown in Appendix A. The expectation of intra-domain handoff latency of ADA in BT mode is given by: (21).
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 24 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 10 as shown in Appendix B. The expectation of intra-domain handoff latency of ADA in RO mode is given by: (25).
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 28 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 10 as shown in Appendix B. Using the analytical framework proposed in 'Performance analysis' section, we evaluate and compare performance of MIPv6, HMIPv6, CNLP, and ADA by numerical analysis.
The relevant deductions for obtaining Equation 14 are analogous to the deductions for Equation 10 as shown in Appendix B. In the analysis of CNLP, we assume that the ORHA is located within the CN's domain and we only consider mobile node-initiated sessions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com