Sentence examples for relevancy of items from inspiring English sources

This process takes days and even weeks with standard keyword search, so ROSS is augmenting keyword search with machine learning to simultaneously speed up the research process and improve relevancy of items found.

Based on findings from Gajewski et al. [ 20], the subject experts tend to overestimate the relevancy of items, resulting in highly biased item-to-domain correlations.

The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations between ratings of the higher pain reported in body regions (head and face, upper extremity, neck and back, chest and stomach, lower extremity) and the ratings of other, remaining items to determine the relevancy of the items for pain.

Patterns were coded based on the relevancy of what items were being tested for, and the items themselves.

Compliance may also be improved through machine learning in order to modify and continuously adapt questions and sampling rates according to an individual's previous responses (e.g. present endorsed items more frequently and vice versa), thus reducing burden and increasing the relevancy of the items [ 29].

Third, the agreed list of translated items was presented to an external team of health professionals and medical researchers, mainly to assess the contextual relevancy of the items and the understandability of their translation.

The results provide insight in regards to the relevancy of the items, and fully capture the conceptual meaning of the undertaken affective variables in the Indonesian, Malaysian, and Thai context due to the possibility of item translation that bias from its original item.

Twelve reviewers assessed relevancy of each item to oral dysesthesia symptoms by 1 4 scoring scale and item content validity index was computed.

To illustrate, a panel of subject experts are asked to review a set of potential items and instructed to provide response for questions such as "please rate the relevancy of each item to the overall topic of [domain]." The response options are generally designed on a four-point Likert scale that ranges from "not relevant" to "highly relevant".

Eliciting subject experts' perception regarding the relevancy of each item to the domain (construct) of interest is a common practice to aid in verifying content validity evidence.

They were asked to rate the relevancy of each item to the concept of cancer-related fatigue for adolescent cancer survivors on a 4-point scale (from 1 = not relevant to 4 = very relevant).