The further interaction of 'Location × Shape relevance' [F 2, 34) = 5.94, p < 0.002; ε = 0.99] indicated that shape relevance was stronger at the relevant than the irrelevant location, with a much larger N400 to both shape-irrelevant pairs (S-) and distracters (S+/-) than targets (S+) at the spatially relevant location.
C1 amplitude was clearly affected by 'Location relevance' per se (F 1, 17) = 9.01; p < 0.01) at this time window too, in that shapes falling at the relevant location (L+ = 2.41 μV; SD = 0.67) elicited a greater positivity than those falling at the irrelevant one (L- = 0.91 μV; SD = 0.41), as visible in maps of Figure 4B.
Furthermore, different quantities, i.e. step length (the distance between successive locations), are relevant to assessing the quality of measured turning angles [15] but have little relevance to location accuracy.
Updated hourly, the system filters reports to determine relevance, disease, location, and duplication clustering by means of a series of automated text processing algorithms.
Identification of potential candidate genes has been primarily through speculated functional relevance and/or location within an identified quantitative trait locus, with little or no functional validation.
It updates its working memory with the task-relevance of the recognized entity and updates a topographic task-relevance map with the location and relevance of the recognized entity.
This earliest mesial activity, relative to the first time window 60-800 mshowedowed an increase in negativity for shape relevant stimulus pairs independent of the location relevance.
Factors included: (1) location relevance: L+ (attended location), L- (unattended location); (2) shape relevance: S+ (target pairs), S- (non-target pairs), S+/- (mixed pairs); (3) electrode site: as a function of ERP component of interest; (4) hemisphere (right and left).
This interaction proved that FAs percentage was significantly increased by location relevance, it being overall higher for the relevant than irrelevant location.
'Location' relevance affected N1, it being larger to image-pairs falling at the attended than unattended location [F 1, 17) = 5.67, p < 0.031; L+ = -1.73 μV, SD = 0.58 vs. L- = -0.99 μV; SD = 0.59] (see Figure 2 again).
Our experiences are nuanced and filtered by context, identity and relevance based on location and time.
