relatives with him

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relatives with him" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning. A more appropriate phrase would clarify the relationship or context. Example: "He brought his relatives with him to the family reunion."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Sheikh Dhari went to the meeting, but he brought several relatives with him.

The New Yorker

"He came down three or four times that year and sometimes brought relatives with him.

The New York Times

For his last visit, Ahmadinejad took more than 100 allies and their relatives with him and returned to criticism at home for the size of his entourage.

The Guardian

One had even brought some elderly relatives with him - presumably to make it less likely the car would be stopped and searched.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Other relatives went with him to help, said his wife, Tandra Estes.

The New York Times

David, who just turned 15, lives with his parents and a sister on the Upper East Side; Trent, freshly 14, lives on Long Island, but has a Midtown apartment where a relative stays with him during the workweek; and Kiril, also 14, is from San Diego but is staying with his mother in Midtown for the duration of the show.

The New York Times

The main reason for voters' relative unfamiliarity with him was the intense and intentional mainstream media blackout of Bernie Sanders throughout the Fall, dubbed the "Bernie blackout".

Huffington Post

Mr. Chestnut also credits Savion Glover, who gave him his break in "Noise/Funk" and who is a distant relative, with giving him his start.

The New York Times

Nearly 60 people who came into contact with the man, including three relatives who travelled with him on the plane, have been identified, the BBC reported.

Independent

Since he arrived he has had to sell his car — he got $1,500 for it — because he needed to feed his family of six and he wanted to help the other seven relatives who fled with him, who are all women and children.

The New York Times

It broke my heart to know the school teachers and administrators thought of my child as the "bad kid," a label that I knew from having so many teacher relatives could stick with him indefinitely.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone being accompanied by family, use more specific phrases like "He brought his relatives with him" or "His relatives accompanied him" for clarity.

Common error

Do not use "relatives with him" without providing context. It can be unclear whether you're referring to accompaniment or a specific attribute shared between them. Reword to clarify the relationship or action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relatives with him" functions as a noun phrase, but its grammatical role is questionable because it is not a standard or clear construction. Ludwig AI indicates that it lacks clarity, requiring rephrasing for better comprehension.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Formal & Business

12.5%

Less common in

Science

12.5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "relatives with him" is grammatically questionable and lacks clarity in standard English writing. While it appears in some sources, including news and media, it is recommended to use more explicit and grammatically sound alternatives, such as "relatives accompanying him" or "his relatives who were with him", for improved precision and comprehension. Ludwig AI advises that this phrase is unclear, emphasizing the need for more careful and contextual phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Relatives accompanying him

Emphasizes the action of relatives going along with him.

Family members with him

A more general term, substituting "relatives" with "family members".

His relatives who were with him

Clarifies that the relatives were in his presence.

The relatives in his company

Highlights the idea of relatives being together with him as companions.

His family alongside him

Suggests relatives are supporting or standing by his side.

His kin travelling with him

Kin is used as a synonym of relatives and emphasize the idea of travelling.

The relations accompanying him

A more formal substitution of relatives.

His folks that were with him

An informal term, replacing relatives with folks.

His family present with him

Stresses the presence and togetherness of his relatives.

The relatives near him

Focuses on the proximity of his relatives.

FAQs

What's a clearer way to say "relatives with him"?

For better clarity, consider phrases like "relatives accompanying him" or "his relatives who were with him", which specify the nature of their relationship or presence.

Is "relatives with him" grammatically correct?

While sometimes used, "relatives with him" can sound awkward. It's generally better to use a more explicit construction to avoid ambiguity, like "family members with him" or specify their action.

How can I use "relatives with him" in a sentence?

While not the strongest phrasing, you could use it to indicate presence, but it's clearer to specify their role or action: "The patient flew in on a private jet and we screened the crew members, as well as four relatives accompanying him."

What's the difference between "relatives with him" and "his relatives"?

"His relatives" simply refers to his family members. "Relatives with him" implies their presence or association in a specific context, although it's better to rephrase it for clarity: "He brought his relatives with him" is preferred.