Sentence examples for relatively low importance from inspiring English sources

We decided to keep the item asking about anxiety in the domain "emotions" despite its relatively low importance scores on the patient survey (60% of patients considered this an important item to add, versus over 70% for other items), because anxiety is more common in female patients with OSA [37, 38] and women were slightly underrepresented in the sample.

Therefore, we believe that the cocrystallization mechanism of phytosterol-induced serum CH lowering has relatively low importance, unless the diet is specially designed to include relatively little amounts of dietary fats.

The evolutionarily conserved T31 plays a pivotal role in the inhibition of cruzipain, while it is of relatively low importance for the inhibition of cathepsin L (Table 2).

Regarding knowledge of preventive measures, most respondents assigned relatively high importance to hand hygiene and area isolation but saw personal protective equipment as being of relatively low importance.

The density of CGPs enters significantly negative in the PGP-equation, indicating competition effects especially with PGPs and a relatively low importance of referrals to PSPs.

The male physician group, in contrast to the female one, also assessed gender of relatively low importance in contact with colleagues and staff.

Surprisingly, Concrete Friendly was rated as relatively low in importance by PAC buyers/users (mean = 3.08), but vendors' promotional materials mention this attribute the most frequently in their on-line promotional materials (WFC = 76).

'Awareness of patient' (includes empathy) was ranked relatively low in importance in both studies (78% respondents agreed/strongly agreed in this study, 82% in the hospital study).

For instance, perhaps students fail to use non-adaptive factors in their evolutionary explanations because they view the lack of emphasis on drift in the classroom as indicative of its relatively low level of importance in evolutionary change.

Though the ICCs between batches were higher than those estimating temporal reliability, they were relatively low, demonstrating the importance of measuring all samples in one batch when possible.

The criterion 'geographical coverage' was rated relatively low in its importance for the evaluation of breast cancer interventions, followed by 'safety' and 'affordability', respectively.