Given this hypothesis, what function(s) may be performed by posterior hippocampus which explain why it was engaged by perceiving scenes relative to perceiving single objects?
The contrast of perceiving scenes relative to perceiving single acontextual objects (perceive scenes – perceive objects) revealed a swathe of voxels along the length of bilateral hippocampi (Fig. 3, top left), with peak coordinates at (−21, −12, −21) in left and (30, −30, −6) in right hippocampus.
We then compared the connectivity between the hippocampus and other brain regions for perceiving scenes, constructing scenes, and constructing relative to perceiving scenes (with object baselines subtracted).
This type of relative judgment is essentially a percentage reflecting the ratio of the perceived target eccentricity relative to the perceived total extent of the stimulus space (i.e., the perceived eccentricity of the aperture edge).
Furthermore, the perceived onset of the tone is shifted earlier in time relative to the perceived onset of tones in a baseline condition in which the tone is presented without action.
The perceived onset of the action is shifted later in time relative to the perceived onset of actions in a baseline condition in which the action does not produce a tone.
However, this study differed from the present study in that participants made judgments relative to their perceived visual field extent, and the results show a consistent peripheral bias in perceived location.
During this period the perceiver makes decisions concerning how to act relative to the perceived person.
In general, weights are constructed in a manner where all branches of a criterion are normalized relative to their perceived importance.
Each group was assigned a numerical discomfort score relative to the perceived discomfort value of elbow flexion, which exhibited the lowest level among all joint motions investigated in this study, and, therefore, was set as a reference point.
