Sentence examples for relative revision from inspiring English sources

Cox-estimated survival and relative revision risks are presented with adjustment for differences among groups regarding gender, type of fixation, type of prosthesis, and age at revision.

Although there is debate about how much the threshold for revision influences the relative revision rate of UKA and TKA, it certainly does influence it to some extent.

The results from statistical analyses using the previously described methods for example, revision rates and adjusted relative revision risks—are then used as benchmarks, as criteria for ranking, and for compilation of league tables.

Thus, when identifying outliers, either UKA and TKA should not be combined or the method used to combine them should be altered by adjusting for the relative revision rates of UKA and TKA.

Cox multiple regression, with adjustment for age, sex, and type of fixation of the prosthesis was used to calculate the survival of the prostheses and the relative revision risks.

A Cox multiple regression model was used to study relative revision risks (failure-rate ratios) among the 4 types of revision procedures, with adjustments for possible influence of gender, type of fixation (uncemented or cemented with or without antibiotic), type of prosthesis (monoblock, modular), and age of the patient at revision.

Thus, adjustment of relative re-revision risk ratios were performed by partitioning follow-up time into 2 intervals: 0 3 years and > 3 years (for year of revision operation) and 0 7 years and > 7 years (for type of revision TKA) using Cox regression analysis.

We found increased relative risk of revision and increased cumulative 5 year revision rates due to infection after primary THA during the period 1995 2009.

The largest increase in relative risk of revision due to infection was for uncemented THAs, but the overall risk of revision due to infection was similar for cemented, uncemented, and inverse hybrid THAs.

Adjusted Cox regression analyses were performed to assess relative risk of revision due to infection and to estimate adjusted cumulative 5-year probability (risk) of revision.

However, we were, from the start, aware of the relative indication for revision that to some extent may be related to the surgeon and ease of revision.