Sentence examples for relative objective from inspiring English sources

When comparing different GP methods, the average (relative) objective values of obtained scheduling heuristics are the primary performance measures.

Physical functional status and the incidence of disease are relative objective indicators, which are more sensitive in response to socioeconomic factors (Sun et al. 2003).

As an illustration of the method, five different scenarios for the relative objective preferences were examined with the corresponding optimal solutions being determined.

On the other hand, the average relative objective value or the sum (or average) of relative deviations try to measure the quality of evolved heuristics weighted by the difficulty of training instances.

Then extending the GLA to G2LA method by utilizing the measurement of grey relational analysis (GRA) which depends on the effect of relative objective and initial codevectors of FGVQ to obtain a better representative codebook.

In addition, a relative objective method of cluster analysis was performed based on symptom scores for the main DLB symptoms in this study, and the symptoms of interest were rated by trained research clinicians using standardised and validated instruments.

Place of death will also be compared with the place where the patients spent most part of the three months before death, as reported by their relatives (objective 1.1 in Table 1).

Turbidity is therefore frequently adopted as a surrogate for suspended sediment concentrations (SSC), or as a relative and objective measure of water clarity in monitoring programmes.

An agent's degrees of belief determine her estimates of certain quantities: the values of bets, or the desirabilities of gambles more generally, or the probability assignments of various 'experts' — humans, relative frequencies, objective chances, or truth values.

Analysis focused on participants' evaluation of their performance relative to objective criteria.

Overall, participants showed a positive self-judgment bias, overestimating the number of trials they had performed correctly relative to objective criteria.