Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Although such a performance may seem relatively low, these results represent relative improvements to the second best method of 50% (MCC) and 24% (r).
The results were encouraging as the correctness and accuracy rates exhibited relative improvements of 2.8 and 2%, respectively, relatively to a baseline system.
With more adaptation data, the relative improvements are negligible.
This corresponds to 6.06%, 10.15%, and 10.53% relative improvements.
These are 68.8 and 61.5 % relative improvements over the baseline.
After almost 10 years of development, the technology of QDs surface modifications has realized relative improvements.
They solved the common and regular module, synthesis subband with relative improvements.
The relative improvements over the ML eigenphone method are 181.5%, 36.4%, 7.8%, and 2.5%, respectively.
The Taguchi approach and FGP approach provide relative improvements of 61.2% and 41.2%, respectively.
These result in the relative improvements of DRABAL's F1Score over BR-RF and CC-MLE of 19.1 and 108.28%, respectively.
These profiles were then compared to the best uniform operations through the relative improvements of the performance index.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com