relative evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relative evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing evidence that is dependent on or related to a particular situation or comparison. Example: "In the debate about climate change, relative evidence from different regions can help us understand the varying impacts on local ecosystems."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Argumentative text

Academic lectures

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Argumentative text: It expresses the writer's viewpoint by presenting relative evidence to convince the audience of a particular stance.

Language Testing in Asia

Presumably, this act of acquired belief is an act of the intellect and a response to the relative evidence of a given proposition or an entire syllogism taken together (see above An Evident Judgment).

SEP

For a brain-based detection technology to be adopted as a predictive screening test, it should have a similar or higher diagnostic value than other existing tests.6 It thus requires a certain degree of consensus on the relative evidence base.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

From the AICc differences (ΔAICc), we calculated AICc weights and the relative evidence ratios.

Plosone

These indices of model parsimony identify relative evidence of model(s) from a set of candidate models.

Plosone

Relative evidence for each model was evaluated using the Bayesian Information Criterion BICC) [52] and the uncertainty surrounding each posterior parameter estimate.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Suspicion or diagnosis of PDB was based on description by relatives, evidence of bone deformities and pain strongly suggestive of PDB (II-3 (Fig. 2a), II-8 and II-10) and, when possible, direct evidence of elevated total AP, X-ray scanning and bone scintigraphy (III-1, III-3 (Fig. 2b), III-6, III-12 and III-13; Fig. 1, Table 1).

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Here, I use the Log Bayes Factor (LBF) as a measure of relative model evidence, where a smaller LBF indicates better model evidence, and in the present context this means higher predictive validity.

Biological Psychology

On the other hand, the notion of progress explicated by EP (or by the combination of RP and EP) is relative to evidence and justification but at the same time non-cumulative.

SEP

Data collection presented two distinct challenges relative to evidence generation: timeliness and comprehensiveness.

Health Research Policy and Systems

A positive family history was sought in all patients with a first degree relative with evidence of CAD.

Clinical interventions in aging

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the strength of evidence, clarify the frame of reference by specifying what the evidence is "relative" to. For instance, state "relative evidence compared to previous studies" or "relative evidence within this specific context" to prevent ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "relative evidence" without clearly establishing the comparison. The term implies a relationship, so always ensure you articulate what the evidence is being compared against to avoid vagueness and maintain precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relative evidence" functions primarily as a noun phrase that modifies the noun "evidence". It describes evidence that is assessed or understood in relation to other evidence or a specific context. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

93%

News & Media

4%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "relative evidence" is a valuable tool for nuanced communication, particularly in contexts that demand precision and comparative analysis. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Its strength lies in its ability to specify the relationship between different pieces of data, ensuring that arguments are well-supported and logically sound. Remember to contextualize the comparison to avoid ambiguity and maximize clarity in your writing. The frequent use of "relative evidence" in scientific and academic writing indicates its suitability for formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

comparative proof

Focuses on comparing different pieces of evidence to establish a point.

contextual data

Emphasizes the importance of the data's background to its relevance.

relevant testimony

Highlights the pertinence and significance of evidence in a given situation.

pertinent evidence

Highlights the direct connection of the evidence to the matter at hand.

conditional evidence

Suggests the evidence is valid under certain conditions or assumptions.

circumstantial proof

Implies evidence is indirect but suggestive of a particular conclusion.

correlated findings

Focuses on the degree to which evidence aligns with other discoveries.

differential indicators

Stresses the use of evidence to differentiate between various scenarios.

qualified affirmation

Indicates evidence that supports a claim with certain limitations.

probative information

Emphasizes the evidence's ability to prove or disprove a claim.

FAQs

How is "relative evidence" used in academic writing?

In academic writing, "relative evidence" is often used to compare the strength of support for different hypotheses or models. It helps determine which explanation is more likely based on available data.

What is the difference between "direct evidence" and "relative evidence"?

"Direct evidence" directly proves a fact, while "relative evidence" suggests a fact by comparing it to other information or situations. "Relative evidence" requires interpretation and context to be meaningful.

What can I say instead of "relative evidence"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "comparative proof", "contextual data", or "relevant testimony" to convey a similar meaning.

In statistical analysis, how is "relative evidence" determined?

In statistical analysis, "relative evidence" is often assessed using measures like Bayes factors or AIC weights. These methods quantify the strength of evidence for different statistical models relative to each other.