Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Figure 4 shows another way of displaying the relative errors of different combinations of regulatory inputs.
The relative errors of fluence rates computed using the cDA and the DA are shown in Fig. 10.
This represented band specific relative errors of 10 15%.
Relative errors of the LIBS measurements are in the range of 1.7 to 12.6%.
The relative errors of palaeohydrological reconstructions are probably closer to the latter value.
More than 95% of the local relative errors of Um were below 20%.
Relative errors of horizontal and vertical divergence angles were 0.65% and 0.61%.
The relative errors of each frequency are all less than 3.7%.
Meanwhile, the relative errors of aerodynamic parameters are less than 10%.
The resulting models show a satisfactory accuracy in validation terms (e.g., average relative errors of 50%).
The relative errors of computed Z values for the ANN model were mostly around ±10%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com