For different times, (a) whether PCS or MCS, the ratio of the gap between the various dimensions exhibited a decreasing trend and (b) the relative degree of interaction between PCS and MCS presented a discrepancy.
With the exception of those comparisons made between high latitude populations of F. p. tundrius (see below), we remain cautious and resist equating reported population differentiation estimates with actual relative degree of differentiation between populations [e.g., 55,94 96].
For different times, the relative degree of interaction between PCS and MCS presents a discrepancy.
The above argument illustrates the crux of the problem: whether a gene-specific or genome-wide selective sweep occurs depends on the relative degree of linkage between the E and N loci, and the S and N loci.
Moreover, a Spearman rank correlation test between the microarray and qPCR analyses of the relative magnitude of the CORT effect for each of the 12 genes (ranked from most repressed to most activated) was highly significant, indicating strong agreement in the relative degree of change between the 2 measures of expression.
The approach is based on a relation between the relative degree from the unknown input to the output variables for nonlinear Hessenberg systems.
Simple design conditions are presented for decentralized output feedback controllers that achieve output consensus between nonlinear, relative degree one Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) with stable zero dynamics.
As for female lines, the correlation of r was greater between line D and the crossbred populations than between line C and the crossbred populations, which could be due to a greater correlation of r between lines D and B than between lines C and B. The correlation of r can reflect the relative degree of similarities and divergences between purebred animals.
The relative degree of dominance by P. gracilis is defined as the difference between the two measures: Ddiff = Dgracilis − Dferrugineus.
The relative degree of anonymity.
